Friday, March 6, 2015

Breaking Barriors

When this blog started way back when, I didn't want my posts to be about weight and diets.  However, behind the posts, it was about weight and diets.

An recent email exchange between me, Scoundrel, Galan and Lard brought this post about.  When this blog started in late 2007 I weighed in the mid 280s. (My high school graduation weight was 180lbs and  I peaked at 290 in 2006)  I had been playing racquetball for about 9 months (restarted after a 15 year layoff) and Scoundrel had just introduced me to world of kettlebells.  You would have thought with all this activity my weight would just melt off. (A least I did) Well it didn't.  Recently though, I am at my lowest weight in 29 years - 234lbs.  My body fat % has gone from 37+% to 27.5% This lead Galan to ask, "How did you hold onto the 275+ lbs?"

I believe there were several factors on why I was holding onto the weight.
1 – Diet: Chocolate milk (NesQuik), eggos w/peanut butter & Dew and second lunches at work ;) – changed late ’09. No Dew, No eggos, NesQuik as a treat.
2 – Inactivity – once a week softball in the summer wasn’t going to do it ;) – started playing racquetball in ‘07
3 – Undiagnosed diabetes. – treated late ’09 – dropped 20lbs in 6 months to 260.  And stayed there! (see #1)
4 – Hormone imbalance. – Thyroid and testosterone.  As these were brought back into the normal range, I began to lose weight. Thyroid in ’12, Testosterone late ‘14

The last 3 years have been heavy on the exercise: kettlebells twice a week (sometimes 1, sometimes 3). Racquetball: moving from recreational to competitive and playing 4-5 times a week, plus tournaments.  However, my weight stayed fairly consistent around 260. I had nudged it down ~10lbs to 255/250 late this summer.  Starting in November '14, from the advice of my trainer, I started taking a Thyroid supplement, DHEA & D136.  I lost 18lbs since January 1 and 31lbs Since July.  An interesting note, my thyroid (TSH) went from 4.02 (Sep) to 0.0 1(Feb) and testosterone went from 233 (Sep) to 544 (Feb)!  Without any real diet change, I started losing 1.5lbs a week.

Carrying that extra weight around did do some damage though. I have bone on bone medial osteoarthritis and knee cap on my right knee.  However, I knew my knee wasn’t the best, playing racquetball on it at 280lbs didn’t help.  I needed to manage it better after my meniscus surgery in August of ‘10.  It was never right after that.  I got it wrapped in ice right now and I’m wearing a copper sleeve and have capsaicin cream on it too.  Taking voltaren and ibuprofen/aspirin/Tylenol to supplement.  It only hurts when my heart beats and I can't straighten it fully.  At the end of the month, I am being evaluated for knee replacement :(.   

Read More...

Thursday, February 7, 2008

Quest for fire.

I want to document some of my recent reading to share my findings with you guys. I’m not going to rewrite the articles that I read so there will be several links at the end.

I wrote a couple of weeks ago that I was on a quest to find whether there was a fat burn zone. There was some disagreement on the DD forum as to weather this ‘zone’ exists. Some guys point to Tabata and High Intensity Interval Training and say that the end result of exercising in the high end anaerobic zone has an overall effect of burning more fat calories than the traditional aerobic exercise at 70% of Heart rate max . Originally this interested me because I luv when it’s intense (plus I’m fat). It sounded like the best of all worlds. However, the first two weeks I used my heart monitor with the kettlebells, I noticed an unexplainable drop in intensity (expressed as heart rate max) on the next workout day after an especially great day. The trend continued downward for the next two weeks. I was not happy.

The next book that I read after the one that gave me a panic attack about acidosis was another old Heart Rate Monitor book that I picked up used at Amazon. This book’s main focus was using the monitor to work at 70% HRMax. The book was geared to runners, but the theory was interesting. The recommendation was based on the supposition that people over train. The author’s recommendation was to begin training up to, but not exceeding 70% HRMax (totally different from high intensity type training). His recommendation was to do this for six weeks. The long term goal is fast training maintaining a HR of no less than 85% HRMax with the alternating or supplimental workouts remaining under 70% HRMax. There was a lot of antecdotal evidence that the runners were eventually able to run faster at 70% HRMax at the end of the six weeks, they had more energy, and their race times increased. The basis of his theory is essentially one of ‘conservation and restoration.’ I found this extremely interesting. I wasn’t convinced that I was overtraining, but I was confused as to why my ‘tank’ was running dry. Did I need to conserve my energy?

So...I began to read several articles on line. This may be old news for you guys, some of it was for me, but what I found out was that there are three types of muscles: slow twitch, fast twitch and the other fast twitch. I knew that. What I didn’t know was that each type of muscle uses ATP as its fuel, but depending on the type of muscle and intensity of the exercise, a different ‘source’ for creating ATP is used. For immediate energy there is only a few seconds worth of fuel (creatine phosphate - a high energy phosphate compound) stored in the muscle cells. This is used for the faster fast twitch muscles (fight or flight, sprints, etc.). The second ‘source’ is glycogen. Muscle cells first split the glycogen into glucose( a sugar ) and then metabolizes it to make ATP. Glycogen is stored in the muscles, blood stream, and liver. It is converted to ATP via the might mitochondria. The third, and most abundant, source is fat which is also converted to ATP at the lower heart rate ranges.

To me this is the Holy Grail. First, I now knew that there is a fat burn zone. I know this intuitively from when I used to jump rope for 40 to 60 minutes back in college and had 8% BF. (Karate too, but no lifting, or running). Secondly, the idea of conservation and restoration was new to me. It takes 24 to 48 hours to replenish your ATP reserves. If you keep hitting it hard, it’s no wonder your batteries run dry…especially if you're an out of shape, 45 year old, fat slob. This made total sense.

So the benefits of working out at the aerobic zone level are: increased level of oxidizing body fat; restoration of ATP and conservation of glucose for hitting it harder during your anaerobic workouts; and increased mitochondrial density.


Here are some of the great articles I read:


Muscle Fibers - An In Depth Analysis: (Tonic And Phasic Muscles - The Original Name For Fast and Slow Twitch and Why It Still Applies! – and - The Body's Three Energy Systems Used For Movement)

Muscle Fibers - An In Depth Analysis Part 2: (Muscle Fibers Makeup and Purpose)

Muscle Fibers - An In Depth Analysis Part 3: (Mitochondrial Density = An Increase In - Fat Burning, Muscle Mass, & Your Ability To Train)

Direct Comparisons of Fuel use during Low, Moderate, and High Intensity Exercises: (Great article that refutes HIIT as a more effective means to burning fat.)




Read More...

Sunday, January 27, 2008

The Little Engine That Could

I’ve been pondering the nature of energy. Both Swami and Galan are experts compared to me. However, that doesn’t mean I can’t be curious and seek to satisfy said curiosity.



The reason for my curiosity is first due to a personal observation that some days I seem to work harder for less. This was made clearer when I started using the Heart Rate Monitor. For example: on Monday I had a more energetic workout then on Wednesday. Same workout, basically, but actually I had to put forth more ‘effort’ on Wednesday. Swami would say that’s natural to have ebbs and flows. And he is right, I know that. And the reasons for that are several: adequacy of rest, fitness level, mental focus, hydration level, did you have a candy bar beforehand, is the moon full, and for some….what time of the month is it. Some of these variables can be controlled or mitigated and some cannot.

The second reason was a ‘disagreement’ on the Dragon Door forum about whether there is a fat burning ‘zone.’ One camp maintains that there is a fat burn zone and that lengthy aerobic work does indeed burn fat. The other camp’s point is that even anaerobic work burns fat long term, and points to studies that support that anaerobic exercise when compared to aerobic exercise actually burns more fat long term. After all sprinters are just as fit as marathon runners are.

Since my swings are highly anaerobic and I have lengthy bike rides for endurance and fat burning, I wanted to get to the bottom of the argument.


FAT BURN

The first article I read was by the incredible Clarence Bass: http://cbass.com/FATBURN.HTM

Here’s a couple of excerpts:

In the moderate-intensity group, seven active young male physical education majors exercised on stationary bicycles 5 days per week for 6 weeks at 70% of V02max, 60 minutes each session. V02max was measured before and after the training and every week during the 6 week period. As each subject's V02max improved, exercise intensity was increased to keep them pedaling at 70% of their actual V02max. Maximal accumulated oxygen deficit was also measured, before, at 4 weeks and after the training.

(It should be noted that 70% is the bottom of the ‘Aerobic Zone.’ and is actually a very slow pace. – Scoundrel)

A second group followed a high-intensity interval program. Seven students, also young and physically active, exercised five days per week using a training program similar to Japanese speed skaters. After a 10-minute warm-up, the subjects did seven to eight sets of 20 seconds at 170% of V02max, with a 10 second rest between each bout. Pedaling speed was 90-rpm and sets were terminated when rpms dropped below 85. When subjects could complete more than 9 sets, exercise intensity was increased by 11 watts. The training protocol was altered one day per week. On that day, the students exercised for 30 minutes at 70% of V02max before doing 4 sets of 20 second intervals at 170% of V02max. This latter session was not continued to exhaustion. Again, V02max and anaerobic capacity was determined before, during and after the training.

Findings: The moderate-intensity endurance training program produced a significant increase in V02max (about 10%), but had no effect on anaerobic capacity. The high-intensity intermittent protocol improved V02max by about 14%; anaerobic capacity increased by a whopping 28%.

But what about the fat burn?

Angelo Tremblay, Ph.D., and his colleagues at the Physical Activities Sciences Laboratory, Laval University, Quebec, Canada, challenged the common belief among health professionals that low-intensity, long-duration exercise is the best program for fat loss. They compared the impact of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise and high-intensity aerobics on fat loss. (Metabolism (1994) Volume 43, pp.814-818)

The Canadian scientists divided 27 inactive, healthy, non-obese adults (13 men, 14 women, 18 to 32 years old) into two groups. They subjected one group to a 20-week endurance training (ET) program of uninterrupted cycling 4 or 5 times a week for 30 to 45 minutes; the intensity level began at 60% of heart rate reserve and progressed to 85%. (For a 30-year-old, this would mean starting at a heart rate of about 136 and progressing to roughly 170 bpm, which is more intense than usually prescribed for weight or fat loss.)

The other group did a 15-week program including mainly high-intensity-interval training (HIIT). Much like the ET group, they began with 30-minute sessions of continuous exercise at 70% of maximum heart rate reserve (remember, they were not accustomed to exercise), but soon progressed to 10 to 15 bouts of short (15 seconds progressing to 30 seconds) or 4 to 5 long (60 seconds progressing to 90 seconds) intervals separated by recovery periods allowing heart rate to return to 120-130 beats per minute. The intensity of the short intervals was initially fixed at 60% of the maximal work output in 10 seconds, and that of the long bouts corresponded to 70% of the individual maximum work output in 90 seconds. Intensity on both was increased 5% every three weeks.

As you might expect, the total energy cost of the ET program was substantially greater than the HIIT program. The researchers calculated that the ET group burned more than twice as many calories while exercising than the HIIT program. But (surprise, surprise) skinfold measurements showed that the HIIT group lost more subcutaneous fat. "Moreover," reported the researchers, "when the difference in the total energy cost of the program was taken into account..., the subcutaneous fat loss was ninefold greater in the HIIT program than in the ET program." In short, the HIIT group got 9 times more fat-loss benefit for every calorie burned exercising.

So…why is that? The bottom line is that compared to moderate-intensity endurance exercise, high- intensity interval exercise causes more calories and fat to be burned subsequent to the workout

OK – takeaway is: high intensity workouts are good. Benefits include increase VO2max and anaerobic capacity as well as long term fat loss. But, I didn’t really get an answer to my question – Is there a fat burn zone? More to come…

Read More...

Thursday, January 24, 2008

Making his case....

I think it's funny how many people are like "Will they improve my sport?", "Are they really worth the money?", will they do this, will they do that? I was compiling their benefits for my notes and thought everyone else might find it interesting. Most of you will recognize a good bit of this information spread throughout Pavel's writings. These are some incredible benefits for just two movements practiced for only 50-150 minutes per week. I haven't even covered flexibility yet. If anyone can add to this list, feel free.

From: http://forum.dragondoor.com/training/message/499672/

Benefits of the Swing

Easy on high-mileage knees.
Strengthen the legs and hips without overdeveloping them.
Build backs.
Dramatically reduce the odds of back injuries.
Forge a vice grip.
Work the abs.
Develop championship conditioning and burn fat without the dishonor of aerobics.

Easy on High-Mileage Knees

Swings rarely irritate even high-mileage knees. They do not have the flexibility demands of squats, but they develop the same movement patterns and muscles. In fact, they have been found to help bad knees. In developing proper lifting technique, the body develops a dynamic stereotype. You will lift with your hips in your day to day life, unloading your knees. Improper recruitment patterns of the hip is usually the problem with bad knees. Think of it like this. If your hips don't turn out right as you pick something up, your knee gets wrenched. If it turns out too much, your knee gets wrenched. If you hips don't take up a load, you knee gets wrenched. Let's face it, the hips just aren't really good neighbors. But, as demonstrated by physical therapist Gray Cook, through proper recruitment training, such as the swing, you can fix this problem.

Strengthen the legs and hips without overdeveloping them.

Ken Shamrock of UFC fame pulls rather than squats because a fighter has no need for heavier legs. Pulls strengthen the legs and hips without overdeveloping them. Chafing is no fun. And for some comrades, for instance special operators and infantrymen, bloody thighs are simply unacceptable.

Build backs.

As Randall Strossen, PhD, put it, to a man of strength a muscular back is what big arms are to a bodybuilder. The swing will develop your back from top to bottom. You lats prevent the weight from getting away and aid the erectors to keep the spine straight through the lumbodorsal fascia. The midsacpula retractors, the muscles between your shoulder blades, contract to keep your upper back in proper alignment. The neck, traps, and lower back are some of the prime movers in the swing.

Dramatically reduce the odds of back injuries.

-Swings strengthen the glutes.

The late Vladimir Janda, MD, from the Czech Republic observed that people with low back dysfunction often exhibit “gluteal amnesia.” And if not overcome with proper recruitment pattern practice, it is likely to lead to more back problems, since the back has to take over the lifting task of the powerful glutes. The glutes are strongly emphasized in the swing.

Scientists have found that when your spine is hyperflexed or very rounded, the lower back muscles just check out and leave all the work of supporting the spine to the ligaments. And ligaments have wavy structures that, when loaded, get the slack pulled out of them. This predisposes them to tearing, leading to chronic pain, osteoarthritic degeneration, and disc herniation.

-Swings stretch the hip flexors.

In Janda’s research, weak glutes were associated with tight hip flexors. The powerful psoas major originates on the vertebrae of the lower back, and inserts into the top of the thigh bone. When it is tight, it pulls on the lumbar spine, or lower back. Again, by strengthening the glutes you reduce your odds of a back injury. This time through a process called reciprocal inhibition. When a muscle contracts, it relaxes the antagonist, or opposing, muscles. Think, the harder you flex your biceps the more the triceps relax. Your body doesn't want to drive with its parking brake on. By increasing the resting tonus of the glutes, you decrease the tightness of your hip flexors.

-Swings develop back extensor endurance.

Those of you with bad backs, and if statistics do not lie, it is every other American, note on your forehead: stretching will relieve the pain, but will not fix you up. Spasms and pain are only symptoms. The real problem is usually weakness. A weak back muscle has to contract hard just to keep you from walking on all fours—spinal erectors are 'anti-gravity muscles'. This tension is difficult to maintain, so the muscle just locks up. Movement and circulation become limited, so it gets even weaker, so it cramps even more to get even weaker to cramp even more... It's a vicious circle.

Trying to fix a bad back with stretching is about as useful as an oil change on the Titanic. Professor Stuart McGill, PhD, the number-one spine biomechanist in the world, concluded that while lower- back strength surprisingly does not appear to reduce the odds of back problems, muscular endurance does (Luoto et. al, 1995). I dare you to find a better developer of the back extensors’ endurance than the high-repetition swing.

-Bracing is superior to hollowing for spinal stability.

When you brace as you lift something, the diaphragm expands to increase intra-abdominal pressure. Within your abdomen, there are many baroreceptors that measure changes in intra-abdominal pressure and adjust muscular tension and blood pressure to support it. This increase in pressure potentiates muscle excitability via the pneumomuscular reflex. This increases your strength as well as supports the lumbar spine.

Think of it like an internal weightlifting belt. The diaphragm is rarely strengthened by conventional training but is heavily emphasized by the breathing patterns used during the swing. Dr. McGill has demonstrated that “bracing” the abdominal wall is essential for protecting the lower back. Through consistent practice, the swing will improve your skill at this by forming a dynamic stereotype as well as strengthening the diaphragm.

-Sensible ballistic loading appears to reduce the odds of ar thritis.

Repetitive ballistic loading of swings and other quick lifts appears to be highly beneficial to your joints—provided you do not overdo it. In Supertraining, Drs. Yuri Verkhoshansky and Mel Siff state: “Joints subjected to heavy impact are relatively free of osteoarthritis in old age and those subjected to much lower loading experience a greater incidence of osteoarthritis and cartilage fibrillation . . . as one progresses up the lower extremity, from the ankle, to the knee, the hip and finally to the lumbar spine, so the extent of fibrillation increases at any given age. It appears that the cartilage of joints subjected to regular impulsive loading with relatively high contact stresses is mechanically much stiffer and better adapted to withstand the exceptional loading of running and jumping than the softer cartilage associated with low loading. Thus, joint cartilage subjected to regular repetitive loading remains healthy and copes very well with impulsive loads, whereas cartilage that is heavily loaded infrequently softens . . . the collagen network loses its cohesion and the cartilage deteriorates.“

Forge a vice grip.

Dr. Fred “Squat” Hatfield stated, “The best grip exercises are always going to be pulling at heavy weights ballistically.” Why train your grip? Firstly, grip is a major weak link in most training. The majority of trainees have a lot of strength, but they lack the grip strength to express it. When your grip is lacking, even a light load can seem heavy.

Secondly, let's try an experiment. Make a fist. A white-knuckle, crush to dust fist. Now, do you feel how your shoulder and biceps flex without you having to tell to. This is Sherrington's Law of Irradiation. Put simply, the nerve signal to flex bleeds off onto the ajoining muscles. What this means for your training is that, by increasing your grip strength, you increase your overall strength. The harder your fist flexes, the harder the ajoining muscles will flex. Increased tension means increased muscle tone.

Work the abs.

“...swings work the abs well,” observed famous powerlifting coach Louie Simmons. You must remember that your abs are utilized in your day-to-day life, not just during crunches. Crunches are a waste of time. Remember that. They do nothing for you and fail to even isolate the abdominals. What?! Oh, my world is shattered! Blasphemy! Remember my example on irradiation. The same happens here. Because your average person's abs are not strong enough to perform a crunch when isolated, the nerve signal to flex bleeds off onto the hip flexors, even though they aren't supposed to be used in the limited movement.

You must remember that forward flexion is not the primary job of the abs. Their actual job is to provide a stable platform for other muscles to pull from. For instance, tensed abdominals balance the pull of the psoas muscles on the spine, maintaining its normal curve. The high-tension breathing pattern along with the secondary part of the swing, abdominal contraction at the apex of the swing, strengthens your core muscles.

Develop championship conditioning and burn fat without the dishonor of aerobics.

According to research conducted at the University of Copenhagnen, swings were found to be at least as effective cardio as running and bicycling. But it was found that, due to the bracing performed during the pull, the swing had rather unique benefits. (Cook et al. 2005) He looked at the carotid arterial compliance and BRS, baroreceptor sensitivity, of two groups. One group had been doing the valsalva maneuver, bracing against resistance, while training their VO2 Max while the other had not.

Arterial compliance is how easily the heart and arteries are stretched. If the aorta is able to expand, it expands and allows the blood to be sent through with minimal resistance. This means that there is not a waste of energy on the part of the heart. Think of it like this. Would you rather try to blow up a balloon or a bottle?

Recall that baroreceptor measure changes in intra-abdominal pressure. They regulate muscular tension and blood pressure. BRS is their reactivity to these changes. The greater their sensitivity, the greater their response. With improved response comes a longer, happier, more productive life.

When he analyzed the results, he found that arterial compliance and BRS doubled in these individuals. These two benefits alone make the swing the ideal form of exercise, even without all the other benefits listed. These two will ensure a fail-safe heart.

Benefits of the Get-up

Get-ups fill in the small gaps in your armor left by the swing’s blanket bombing

Build classic torsos and strong arms.
Make the shoulders flexible and resilient.
Fortify the abs and the obliques.

Build classic torsos and strong arms.

Overhead lifting build's a torso along the line of Laurent Delvaux's statue Hercules: broad shoulders with just a hint of pecs, back muscles standing out in bold relief, and wiry arms. Eugene Sandow, George Hackenschmidt, and the other strongmen of yesteryear rarely if ever did light triceps work yet they sported symmetrical and well cut up "horseshoes". These early ironmen believed that the triceps needed very heavy stimulation. Science later caught up with their intuitive discovery. A study by Travill found that the brunt of the triceps work, regardless of the exercise and the loading angle, is performed by the medial head. Only when the resistance gets very heavy do the lazy lateral and longheads kick in.

Make the shoulders flexible and resilient.

The habit of having overly slack muscles of the upper back flicks a few switches in the spinal cord where muscular length and tension are regulated. The muscle starts perceiving your decidedly unmilitary bearing as the norm and becomes unwilling to contract and shorten. Tightening and hyperactivity of the internal rotators of the shoulder (e.g. the pectorals) and the neck extensors (e.g. the posterior cervical group, the upper trapezius, the sterno-cleido- mastoid muscle) results in inhibition of the deep neck flexors, the scapula retractors (e.g. rhomboid, mid and lower trapezius) and the external rotators of the shoulder (e.g. the rotator cuff). This results in a chin forward slumped posture, often accompanied by shoulder elevation.

Over a period of time the abs, the pecs, and the muscles between your ribs shorten and refuse to straighten out. Once you force them too, they test pathetically weak in the stretched position. This dysfunctional postural and movement pattern results in fertile ground for almost all the common musculo-skeletal ailments of the upper body including neck pain, shoulder pain, rotator cuff injury, cervicogenic headache etc. Why does this happen? Look around. Almost everything we do as a society is done in front of us, driving, cooking, writing, cleaning, computer work. Add in a healthy dose of stress (causing upper trapezius hyperactivity) and you have injury-prone shoulders.

Needless to say, neither extreme makes for a functional human being. An effective muscle has no trouble going from a near cramp to great length and can display great strength anywhere in this range. Get-ups facilitate and strengthen the mid and lower trapezius, rhomoboids and rotator cuff. This in turn will inhibit the upper traps and neck extensors, reversing shoulder elevation and chin forward posture. Strengthening the scapular retractors and facilitation of the rotator cuff results in external rotation of the shoulders, pulling the shoulders out of the vulnerable internal rotation position. That is why one of the first things you will begin to see after beginning the Program Minimum is improved upright posture.

Fortify the abs and obliques.

As soon as you start doing heavy get-ups, you will be pleasantly surprised at the powerful effect this drill has on your abs and obliques. While the swing tends to emphasize the abs, the get-up will target the obliques. The obliques are very important to athletes and fitness freaks alike. Strong, well toned obliques make one's waist look trimmer and are critical to performance. The obliques are the muscles underneath the love handles. Like the abs, they run from your rib cage to your pelvis, but at an angle. The external obliques are aligned in the direction your fingers point when you put your hands in your pockets; the internals run perpendicular to them. The obliques perform a number of functions when used in different combinations. They laterally flex the spine, as in a side bend, rotate the spine, or help the abs with forward spine flexion.

Spine stabilization, as in during the get-up, is another important function of your obliques. This will also strengthen the quadrotus lumborum, deep muscles on the sides of the lower spine, important for back health and difficult to develop. The stronger your muscular corset is, the less the wear and tear on your spine. The few people who train their obliques either do broomstick twists and crunches with a twist—worthless because of the minimal muscular tension they generate—or dangerous twisting situps. Torsion, simultaneous bending and twisting of the spine, chews up the intervertebral disks.

Read More...

Wednesday, January 9, 2008

Swing info from Brett Jones

I wanted to record this on our blog. It's a great post by Brett Jones on his blog. I wanted to 'file' it for future reference in an easily accesable location.

Applied Strength
Strength, Kettlebells, Health, Fitness, and a balanced approach
Sunday, January 06, 2008

Question of the day...

Swing height? How high and why?

Swings are the center of the RKC universe as Rif has so eloquently stated and as such they are essential to master. One of the recurring questions is how high to swing the Kettlebell during swings. My answer is - between waist and shoulder height with an "ideal" of chest to shoulder high.

The swing is about projection of energy not elevation of energy. So if I feel like putting a kettlebell overhead I will snatch it not swing it. Can you swing to the top? Sure - as long as you got there by projecting the kettelbell along its arc of movement and did not "lift" the kettlebell to the top. But most people will begin to lift instead of swing and miss the point of the exercise.

In the swing the movement is more important than the motion - meaning a short, crisp hip snap will provide far more benefit than an incomplete hip snap with a lift of the kettlebell with the arms. Try doing a "progressive" swing where you start with shorter hip motions (but always finish the hips) and gradually over several reps increase the amount of hip motion and kettlebell motion. See where your "best" swings are occuring. I am willing to bet it will be at chest to shoulder level.

And here are three more tips to improve your swing:

Tip #1 - Connect the arms to the body

Stand straight and tall like you have finished a swing and hold your arms out in front of you at shoulder level - now bring the arms down so they connect to your body and are tight against your ribs. Leave your arms there and push your hips back like you are at the bottom of a swing and then reverse the movement with the hips leaving the arms on the ribs until the hips bump the arms off.

Tip #2 - Hike the kettlebell

If you have connected the arms to the body as described above then hiking the kettlebell will come naturally. On the descent with the KB do not let it pull away from you toward the ground but rather connect the arms to the body and hike it back behind you high and tight in the groin.

Tip #3 - Hips lead the race

Once you have connected the arms to the body and hike passed the kettlebell you begin the swing by extending the hips. Obvious - however, you should finish the hip snap/extension long before the kettlebell reaches the top of the swing. And once th kettlebell is decending again and you have reconnected the arms to the body - it is the hips that push back first. Put the hips at the lead of the hip extension and the push back (once the arms have reconnected) and you will gain power and coordination with the swing.


Once you have mastered these tips on the swing try implementing them on your snatches and see if you don't get a great carryover.


read more of MRKC Brett Jones's wisdom on his blog:
http://www.appliedstrength.blogspot.com/

Read More...

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

Target Heart Rate


There is a lot of talk about "Target Heat Rate" when it comes to exercise. The general consensus is that for your workout to be effective you need to be at your THR for at least 20 minutes. To complicate matters, there are 3 target levels depending on what you are trying to achieve.
Fat Burn 60% of your maximum heart rate (age adjusted), Aerobic 70%-80%, Anaerobic 80%-90%.

Currently when I do "cardio" exercises, like the stationary bike, I am trying to hold my HR at the "fat-burn" rate (Which for me is between 105-121 BPM) for at least 30 minutes (my goal is 40 minutes each time) twice a week. But it is really boring! (I might have to try an MP3 player) The stationary bike is a Life Fitness 95ri. The really neat thing is, you can set the bike on "fat-burn" and set your HR and the bike will automatically adjust the resistance to keep you at your THR. I have only done this 4 or 5 times in the past 6 weeks so I don't have any results to report as of now. I need to be more consistent in my application of this exercise. I don't check my HR when doing my weight routine or playing racquetball. I am sure it is higher because it feels like my heart is going to pound out through my chest! I know Scoundrel and Galan will add their opinions on this subject.

Read More...